U.K. Drunk Driving Law Explained | Injury Implications

United Kingdom drunk driving law imposes the penalties for crimes related to alcohol driving.

To be responsible for the vehicle under the influence of alcohol, while on the right of blood alcohol without a car, may lead to disqualification of a license, up to 3 months imprisonment and a maximum fine of £ 2500.

Driving (or attempting to) while over the limit of alcohol in the blood almost always results in at least 12 months driving ban, a fine of up to £ 5000 and up to 6 months' imprisonment for serious crimes, or worse. In almost all cases, it is rare that a lawyer can do to prevent the withdrawal of the license. There is very little chance for UK drink driving lawyer ability to mount a "legal defense".

Refusal to provide the police with a breath, urine or blood, when requested, may result in similar sentences. As part of the drink driving laws, the police has the right to request the breath sample for analysis of a person who is driving under any circumstances. They also have the right to demand the breath sample, if you try to drive or driving in a private land, which is accessible to the public. There are currently 35 micrograms of alcohol per 100 milliliters of breath prescribed limits of alcohol, which is the equivalent of 80 mg of alcohol per 100 milliliters of breath. The demand for breath sample must come from a uniformed officer of one of the following three conditions:

1. must be reasonable grounds for suspecting that the person has consumed alcohol
2. officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting the violation of traffic
3. it must be believed that the driver had stopped participating in the accident

In most cases, claims against drunk drivers should be made to the insurer, and if the drivers of uninsured hit and prospects that the incident Motor Insurers Bureau compensates for drivers of uninsured compensation to innocent victims, but there are circumstances where a drunken the driver of the vehicle used as a weapon in a deliberate attempt to injure by 3rd party, and in these cases also, you can apply for financial compensation to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority.

Source: Wikipedia UK Drunk Driving Page

U.K. Drunk Driving Law Explained | Injury Implications

First 5 Critical Steps At The Time of Accident

Step 1

Since many personal injury attorneys work on a contingency fee most lawyers don't take cases they do not think can win. A contingency fee means the lawyer is paid a percentage of the settlement instead of per hour. This increases the likelihood that both the attorney and injured party will make money since the lawyer is highly motivated to get you a settlement. Do a little research before you call a lawyer. If you know a friend who went through a similar ordeal ask if he or she recommends their attorney.

Step 2

Did you get hurt in an accident? There is no personal injury case without an injury and these can go beyond broken bones, cuts and bruises. Going to the hospital and/or having medical bills helps prove that you were actually injured, especially if you were taken by ambulance from the scene of the accident. Personal injury attorneys get paid from your settlement and right to be compensated if you are hurt through the fault of someone's actions. Doctor bills and documentation are part of the evidence that make up a legal case.

Step 3

Call the police at the scene of an auto accident. Hopefully the person at fault will be ticketed which can also help prove liability. If the injury is automobile accident related, a personal injury attorney will ask about traffic citations. You can help by writing down any information that you recall after the accident happened.

Step 4

The personal injury attorney intake person, legal assistant or paralegal will ask about insurance. The basis of being able to collect money if a personal injury case is filed and won is a person or company that is liable who can pay. Personal injury attorneys work for the injured person and the scope of what defines an "injury" is wide in some cases, so the bottom line is if you think you have been hurt you should take the time to call.

Step 5

If you were injured in a car accident and have proof to back it up, especially if you were not at fault and the injury has had an impact on your life or ability to work or earn money, then it's likely a call to a personal injury lawyer will not hurt. The basis of all this is that if you were hurt in an accident seemingly at the fault of someone else and you want to try to sue them then you should call a lawyer. They will tell you if you have a case.

SOURCE: www.Injurylawyers4u.co.uk

First 5 Critical Steps At The Time of Accident

SORRY - turns out you CAN'T sue for putting nails in YOUR OWN head...

44-year-old man presented to his local emergency department wearing a baseball cap and complaining of headaches that had progressively worsened over the preceding 11 weeks.

After he was provided generous analgesia and performed simple investigations that failed to identify a diagnosis, the patient removed his cap to reveal an assortment of metallic objects embedded in his scalp. Plain radiographs showed 11 nails penetrating into his brain. A detailed history revealed a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia, and the patient confirmed that he had hammered a nail into his head each week for the past 11 weeks to rid him of evil.

The nails were removed with the patient under general anesthesia, and he made an uncomplicated recovery with no neurological deficits.

SORRY - turns out you CAN'T sue for putting nails in YOUR OWN head...

Jury Awards Over $2 Million for Client Injured by Defective Chair - in Personal Injury Law Firm!

It appears that the Florida law firm of Fetterman & Associates not only litigates but spontaneously creates personal injury cases. Robert and Heather Friedrich went to the law firm in search of recovery for injuries from an accident — they found it, albeit for injuries in the law firm itself when Robert sat in a defective chair. A jury has awarded the couple more than $2 million for the injury.

Robert and Heather were seeking representation for injuries from a car accident when they went to the law firm. The chair’s failure caused Robert to fall backwards and hit his head — causing him medical bills of more than $200,000 and the loss of his job.

The jury in this comparative negligence state apportioning 67.5 percent of the liability to the furniture store that sold the chair to the firm in 1998 and 32.5 percent to Fetterman.

The chair was purchased from Brandon Home Furnishings in January 1998 and was defectively manufactured according to the jury.

On its website, Fetterman proclaims:

Fetterman and Associates, the Law Team, has been helping people with legal problems for more than thirty years. We seek justice for people who have suffered from the negligence of others, or who have been deprived of their rights or property by insurance companies or big business. Our focus is protecting the rights of injured people and their families.

Of course, sometimes it is not the negligence of others that brings cases to the firm. At times, a predator can become prey in the world of personal injury law.

In defense of the firm, however, I fail to see how the firm is responsible for a defectively manufactured chair unless there was some warning or overt weakness. Perhaps such evidence was introduced. Otherwise, it is a bit of a harsh burden for offices to be responsible for latent defects in chairs.

Read the original post at: http://www.lawteam.com/

Jury Awards Over $2 Million for Client Injured by Defective Chair - in Personal Injury Law Firm!

Serious Brain Injury Improvement With Cognitive Rehabilitation - New Study Shows

Serious brain injury shows remarkable improvement with cognitive rehabilitation, a study in the January 2009 issue of Neuropsychology shows.
The presented data suggests that treatment may work best when tailored to age, injury, symptoms, and time since injury. Importantly, the findings may help establish evidence-based treatment guidelines.

The researchers worked with studies whose samples and methods were most amenable to rigorous statistical techniques and documented the extent to which various treatments improve the language, attention, memory and other cognitive problems that appear after acquired brain injury (such as from trauma, stroke or loss of oxygen - in other words, not congenital).

The authors had concluded there was enough evidence to generally support the use of a variety of rehabilitative treatments. To develop specific treatment guidelines, this new analysis documented the extent to which treatment type and timing, origin of the injury, recovery level, and participant age affected the odds of success.
Generally, it is better to start treating patients as early as possible, rather than waiting for a more complete neurological recovery. Even older patients (age 55 and up) may benefit from cognitive rehabilitation, particularly if the brain injury is due to stroke.

Clinicians should focus their efforts on direct cognitive skills training in specific cognitive domains. More holistic, non-targeted interventions appear to be less effective. Especially if they were treated soon after the event, language training helped older people after stroke. Language training was still effective, just not as much, when it started more than a year after the stroke.

Serious Brain Injury Improvement With Cognitive Rehabilitation - New Study Shows